De volatiliteit van Britse aandelen, obligaties en het Britse pond als gevolg van de Brexit zal in de loop van dit jaar het hoogste niveau bereiken. Dat verwacht vermogensbeheerder AXA IM. Na 2018 is er meer duidelijkheid en wordt het aantal mogelijke uitkomsten van de onderhandelingen tussen de EU en het Verenigd Koninkrijk dus een stuk beperkter, analyseert senior econoom David Page.
Vooralsnog belooft vooral 2018 volgens Page een ‘moeilijk’ jaar te worden voor de Britse financiële markten, gezien de politieke en economische onzekerheden rond het Brexitproces. ‘In deze omstandigheden kunnen kleine verschuivingen in perceptie resulteren in noemenswaardige veranderingen in de vooruitzichten.’ AXA IM verwacht dat het pond sterling zal bewegen tussen de $1,20 en $1,45. Afgezet tegen een gewogen mandje van relevante valuta’s is de Britse munt sinds het referendum 11% in waarde gedaald, het dieptepunt was een min van 16%.
Britse aandelen zijn wel in waarde gestegen. Maar, stelt Page, de prestaties van de FTSE 100 en FTSE 250 blijven achter bij die van de Euro Stoxx index en de S&P 500. Wordt de waardedaling van het pond meegenomen, dan is er sprake van een significante ‘underperformance’.
Onderstaand de complete analyse van David Page.
AXA IM’s David Page – Irreconcilable Brexit risks political upset
David Page, Senior Economist at AXA Investment Managers (AXA IM) identifies thepotential outcomes of the UK trade deal with the EU, the issues surrounding the Irish-UK border and what it means for financial markets.
The conclusion of Phase I of the Brexit negotiations in December allowed talks to move on to focus on the UK’s future relationship with the EU. However, the issue of the Irish border remains unresolved and UK commitments suggest a ‘default’ outcome that is much ‘softer’ than the Brexit currently being discussed.
These commitments appear inconsistent with the UK’s key Brexit objectives – moving beyond the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, striking free trade deals with the rest of the world and avoiding a physical border in Ireland. The resolution of this unstable agreement is likely to affect financial markets and its impact will depend, on when and how, this resolution occurs.
A resolution after the UK has accepted the current deal (and left the EU) is likely to lead to a softer Brexit than markets currently consider, and is on balance, now our central view. This will likely have modest and benign market implications.
Yet, if this problem arises before the UK’s exit, it could de-rail the ongoing negotiations. This threatens a political crisis as well as a broad range of possible outcomes and market implications, which we consider a real risk for this year.
Significant uncertainty surrounds the outlook for Brexit from here. The impact this will have on the process and therefore the UK economy and financial markets is likely to depend on when, or if, this inconsistency becomes apparent. At AXA IM we consider three broad scenarios:
1. The UK government’s right to suggest that this issue can be resolved in negotiation and the issue is resolved with the agreement of a future EU trade arrangement.
2. The UK government’s solution is not accepted and requires alternative solutions, but this only becomes apparent after the UK has formally left the EU in March 2019.
3. The UK government’s solution is not accepted and this becomes apparent, or is anticipated, before the UK leaves the EU. (For full scenarios please click here)
We are sceptical of the UK government’s ability to deliver its vision of Brexit. Seeing a meaningful chance of a political shock materialising this year, as encompassed by our third scenario. However, we recognise a number of incentives to maintain the status quo. On balance, we consider the most likely outcome to be scenario 2. Our central expectation is for the UK to leave the EU as described next year and enter a transition phase that is likely to stretch beyond the suggested two-year timeframe as a longer-term trading relationship is determined.
While we still expect a bespoke trade deal with the EU, we now consider it likely to be much closer to the current relationship with the EU than the Canadian trade agreement – materially softer than has been discussed to date. Such an outcome would still fall well short of the openness the UK currently enjoys with the EU via its Single Market membership. We also suspect that a final arrangement will require some form of physical border in Ireland.
From a market perspective, we emphasise that in considering the outlook for markets this year, scenarios 1 and 2 would likely be indistinguishable. This suggests that prospects for UK asset volatility should be most elevated across the course of 2018. Beyond 2018, the UK’s progress out of the EU and into a transition arrangement would narrow the universe of possible outcomes, and with it dampen the potential for idiosyncratic UK asset volatility.
Implications for financial markets
Economic and political uncertainty, particularly this year, suggests a difficult year for UK asset markets. UK asset volatility is likely to remain relatively high. Indeed, in this environment, minor shifts in perception can result in material swings in outlook. For example, we go on to suggest that sterling could range between <$1.20-$1.45 to the US dollar (USD) under different outcomes discussed in this note. As such, even relatively minor shifts in perceptions – a 10% greater perceived chance of a “no deal” Brexit – could see the sterling/USD exchange rate drop by 3 cents alone.
Sterling is currently 11% lower in trade-weighted terms than before the referendum (9% versus the USD and 13% against the euro). At its weakest, it has been 16% lower in trade-weighted terms (19% USD and 18% euro). This was in line with our pre-Brexit outlook that sterling would face “significant depreciation”.
Equities have risen sharply in nominal terms since Brexit, with the FTSE 100 up 21% and FTSE 250 up 20%. This was contrary to our prediction that the equity outlook would “deteriorate” on the materialisation of Brexit. However, the UK market’s sharp rise falls short of the 30% increase in the S&P 500 and 45% jump in the Euro Stoxx index over the same period. It is more akin to changes in Japan’s Topix or China’s Shanghai Composite indices. In addition, this does not account for sterling’s depreciation. Allowing for sterling depreciation against respective currencies, the FTSE 100 has significantly underperformed market gains in the US, Europe, Japan and China since the UK voted in favour of leaving the EU.
– ENDS –